丰禾棋牌官方网(2)
Zora，是巴黎市郊一家养老院的最新机器人护理员。这个成本超过18000美元的机器人护理员将为养老院的住户们提供陪伴。这个机器人能够带领住户进行锻炼，并和他们互动玩游戏。它已经融入了养老院的生活，住户们和这个机器人之间也形成了类似于人与人的情感连接。许多住户对待Zora就像对待一个人类婴儿一样。当它不在的时候，他们会想它；当它出现的时候，他们抱它，亲它。
The emotional attachments formed with this particular robot caregiver is quite astounding.
与这些特殊的机器人护理形成的情感依恋是令人震惊的。
In the United States, several companies: Ageless Innovation, Tombot, Hasbro and Sony are marketing a slew of robotic companion pets to the loved ones of the elderly. “Paro”, a companion seal pup has shown to calm seniors. Aibo Robot Dog comes with internet connectivity and facial recognition. These robotic pets often cost thousands of dollars with advanced features.
美国的几家公司——Ageless Innovation，Tombot，Hasbro，Sony——正在向老年人推销一系列机器宠物伴侣。Paro，一种海豹幼崽形式的机器人伴侣，可以让老年人平静下来。Aibo Robot Dog，能够连接互联网，并进行面部识别。这些具有高级功能的宠物机器人通常需要花费数千美元才能获得。
On the more affordable end, Ageless Innovation’s Joy For All Companion pets mimics movements and sounds of real pets for around $100. The more affordable models of these robotic pets are popular with both the aging population as well as with kids. In recent years, there are buying guides on Youtube and product reviews on Amazon as the trend of robotic pets proliferate.
在消费领域的平民端，Ageless Innovation推出的Joy For All Companion可以模仿真实宠物的动作和声音，但是花费只需要约100美元左右。这些机器宠物越实惠，也就越受到老年人和孩子们的欢迎。近年来，随着机器宠物的流行，Youtube和亚马逊上出现了一些购买指南。
Can robotic pets replace real pets? Should robotic pets replace real pets?In a study conducted by the researchers from Purdue University and the University of Washington to evaluate the effectiveness of companionship offered by Sony robotic dog to children ages 7 to 15, the study concluded with findings suggesting caution in the assumption of using a robot pet as a substitute as a therapy animal.
机器宠物可以取代真正的宠物吗？机器宠物应该取代真正的宠物吗？在普渡大学和华盛顿大学的研究人员进行的一项研究中，研究人员评估了索尼机器狗为7至15岁的儿童提供的陪伴效果。该研究得出的结论表明，我们需要谨慎考虑能否使用机器宠物作为治疗动物的替代。
Although robot pets can alleviate loneliness for seniors in institutionalized settings, our relationship with these robot pets still needs to be studied. Robot pets still have great limitations as compared to a real four-legged friend.
虽然机器宠物可以机构化的环境中缓解老年人的孤独感，但我们仍然需要研究这些机器宠物与我们的关系。和真正的四条腿朋友相比，机器宠物仍然有很大的局限性。
For instance, the experience of human or animal touch is different from the experience of robot touch. Although robots can mimic empathetic behaviors, they are still just mimicking the behaviors. Real empathy in both pets and humans are the basis of real relationship building. It is this real empathy that serves as the foundation of a good caregiver for both children and the elderly.
例如，来自人或者宠物的触摸，和来自机器人的触摸是大不相同的。虽然机器人可以模仿共情行为，但它们也只是模仿而已。宠物和人类之间真实的共情是建立情感关系的基础。正是这种共情为照料老人和孩子奠定了基础。
Although technology has advanced enough to help us manage our aging population, we, as people, from an ethical point of view need to evaluate whether it’s necessary to replace human or pet interactions with robotic interactions. Perhaps, robots are here only to help us and to assist us to take care of our elderly and our children. Our elderly and our children still need our human interactions to make their lives as fulfilling as possible.
虽然技术已经足够先进，可以帮助我们管理人口老龄化问题，但是，我们作为人类，从道德的角度出发，有必要评估我们是否有必要使用机器人取代来自人和宠物的陪伴。或许，机器人只能用来帮助我们照顾老人和孩子。我们的老人和孩子仍然需要来自我们的陪伴，来充实他们的生活。